research_blog.post
GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Llama aren't just competing for market share—they're fighting to define what intelligence itself means. This analysis breaks down the strategic positioning, technical capabilities, and philosophical differences between the major AI players, and what's really at stake in the benchmark wars.
Each model represents a different "god" in the emerging silicon pantheon, with its own doctrine and values. OpenAI's GPT series acts as the ruling titan, backed by massive resources and first-mover advantage. Google's Gemini is the challenger, wielding an unmatched repository of data. Anthropic's Claude is the constitutionalist, built on a foundation of safety and ethical reasoning. And open-source models like Llama are the populist heroes, democratizing access but raising concerns about misuse.
This post examines the battlegrounds of this war: the context window arms race, the fight for benchmark supremacy (MMLU, HumanEval), and the quest for multimodal dominance. We argue that the choices developers and users make today are not merely about selecting a tool, but about choosing which philosophy of intelligence will shape our future.